My new moniker, courtesy of the Department of Homeland Security. Maybe I should post a content advisory on my homepage…?
This is real. And it is outrageous.
Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed
April 14, 2009...8:39 am
Meet Jane Q. “Right Wing Extremist” Republican
Jump to Comments
15 Comments
April 14, 2009 at 11:35 am
If you say so but what makes you think they’re talking about you?
April 14, 2009 at 11:37 am
Funny in January, the DHS issued a report on Left Wing Groups, I didn’t see that mentioned in this blog.
OR you can always, check out the 2005 Report detailing Left Wing Groups while neglecting the Right Wing Counterparts:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Homeland_Security_omits_%22right-wing%22_threats
Extremism on any level is scary! And it sure does seem like a lot of people are trying to stoke fear among the ignorant by cries of Socialism and fascism! Hilarious enough these two political concepts are foils to eachother…
April 14, 2009 at 11:43 am
Wow! I have to have compassion and sadness for the writer of this blog. Can you imagine spending your days just looking for dirt and angry things to publish, trying to induce fear and hate among people.
No wonder why the Republicans have lost their way. They are the party of fear and intolerance. Instead of promoting the good works of Republican politicians, focusing on the positive things of the world and our country–one chooses to just dish up fear and hate.
How many blogs were posted on Obama’s leadership of the pirate hostage? How many words were printed when everything was pulled off successfully? Even Fox News had the balls to say he did a good job.
Certainly, Jane Q must be a very unhappy person.
I wish you well and much happiness and glad that the last 8 years were so wonderful to you and your country that you can be this spiteful over a lost election.
Just imagine if you were putting this much energy and effort into making your city a better, cleaner place to live.
My goodness.
Intolerance and hate are not the direction for any country and I certainly don’t see the left stoking those fires–especially the President.
April 14, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Well, during the Bush era and the warrantless wiretapping and violations of Constitutional protection against warrantless searches, the neo-coonservatives were fond of proclaiming “if you’ve done nothing wrong, then you’ve nothing to worry about”.
-
Shouldn’t that same mindset hold true today? Or has the morbidity of hypocrisy come home to the practitioners of that black craft?
-
So, what’s the problem? Take it like real men and quit whining.
April 14, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Wow, the paid bloggers are visiting all the sites today…I’ve read the exact same “if you’ve done nothing wrong” post on at least half a dozen sites so far. Thought you paid people would have disbanded after the election..
April 15, 2009 at 10:18 am
At least we have the lefties’ attention today! Posts from the libertarians, conservatives, independents and yes, even democrats will probably be low today as they are all attending the tea parties.
Just exercising my rights as a “radical right wing extremist”! Haha! Didn’t know I was a community organizer all these years!
April 15, 2009 at 11:39 am
It certainly was a hit and run on this blog this morning…but they must keep going to get paid. God, I love reading these words of paranoia from the left…
Maybe a resist the war rally in Pakistan, or being against the shooting of the three pirates…after all we violated their freedoms…would the libs be for or against?…Answer: depends upon who the President is.
On my way to a right-wing extremist Tea Party!!!
April 15, 2009 at 12:19 pm
Marnie F.
Jane writes two sentences and you feel justified in concluding, “Certainly, Jane Q must be a very unhappy person. ” Attacking your opponent in a debate when you lack arguments is an old ploy. The Romans called it the fallacy of arguing ad hominem.
April 15, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Wow! Snaggletoothie you are so brilliant. A real stand-out! Thank you.
For your information this blog is dictated, handled and written up by Ms. Jane Q. I wasn’t referring to a mere couple of sentences but rather the many entries this blog has made to tear down the president.
During the Bush years if you opposed the phenomenal and brilliant president George W. than you were called unpatriotic and reminded that you shouldn’t talk about the president during a time of war. We were told if we didn’t like his leadership we could always leave the country and now what?
You guys lose an election. AN ELECTION in which the majority of American voters elected the president. (How fun is that, an election where the one with the most votes when the race!!!!) And you can’t work to make the country a better place without looking in every single thing for something to bitch about.
If you are going to oppose and vocally condemn every action by this president–please note the many comments and blogs about the pirate ordeal. Then it might do you good to step up and recognize the things he pulls off successfully–oh, like the pirate ordeal.
Snaggletoothie, my heart goes out to you too, for being a pawn to Fox News and Rush and all the rest of those Rightys who make millions because of people like you. Unpatriotic Americans that can’t lose an election without throwing a fit and are too brainwashed to think for themselves and look at reality.
All the best!
Marnie F.
We are still
April 15, 2009 at 4:47 pm
Oh, no I’m a pawn to Fox News. Oh, no, oh, no. Either that or maybe in your world everyone is someone’s pawn.
Why would I care what some unnamed person you referred to said about people who protested against President Bush. I have always defended people’s right to criticize our government.
And your supposed pity for me is just a subtle ad hominem attack. Why can’t you raise yourself above the gutter level personal attacks?
And, if you had read my comment you would have seen that I complimented the administration on my blog for the handling of the affair with the pirates, I think I might have compliment him three or four times before that.
You seem unaware of America’s long history of freedom of expression. And I will criticize Obama whenever I decide it should be done. Maybe you should get together with your uptight, intolerant friends and try to change the constitution if you just can’t handle other people speaking freely. But I think the better course for your over judgmental, controlling self would be to relax and develop some tolerance since a loss of free speech might one day be turned against you.
April 15, 2009 at 4:51 pm
Sorry about saying you didn’t read my comment well enough to read about my defense of Obama. Turns out I said that on another thread. Sorry about that.
April 16, 2009 at 8:53 am
Fox Reporter Contradicts Fox: DHS Report On Right Wing Was ‘Requested By The Bush Administration’
Yesterday, a Department of Homeland Security report about the rising radicalization of “rightwing extremists” was leaked. The right wing was immediately incensed, viewing the report on radical “extremists” as an attack on “conservatives.” MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, for example, tried to suggest it was a report about Republican “loyalists.”
However, this morning, Fox News’s Catherine Herridge revealed that the report, along with an earlier report on radicalized left-wing groups, was actually “requested by the Bush administration” but not completed until recently:
HERRIDGE: Well this is an element of the story which has largely gone unreported. One looks at right-wing groups, as you mentioned. And a second is on left-wing groups. Significantly, both were requested by the Bush administration but not finished until President Bush left office.
April 16, 2009 at 9:22 am
Yes, we knew the report was ORDERED by the Bush Administration however, it wasn’t WRITTEN until the new administration was put into place. And, Janet Napalitano signed her name to it. So, the Bush Administration can’t be blamed for the content of the article…
If you want to compare the Left-wing extremist article you will see that following report consists primarily of animal rights activists but goes on to say that the Left-Wing extremists are anti capitalism etc. This was also written by the current administration.
*************************************************
(U//FOUO) DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines leftwing extremists as groups or individuals who embrace radical elements of the anarchist, animal rights, or environmental movements and are often willing to violate the law to achieve their objectives. Many leftwing extremist groups are not hierarchically ordered with defined members, leaders, or chain of command structures but operate as loosely-connected underground movements composed of “lone wolves,” small cells, and splinter groups.
— (U//LES) Animal rights and environmental extremists seek to end the perceived abuse and suffering of animals and the degradation of the natural environment perpetrated by humans. They use non-violent and violent tactics that, at times, violate criminal law. Many of these extremists claim they are conducting these activities on behalf of two of the most active groups, the Animal Liberation Front and its sister organization, the Earth Liberation Front. Other prominent groups include Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty; and chapters within the Animal Defense League, and Earth First!.
— (U//FOUO) Anarchist extremists generally embrace a number of radical philosophical components of anticapitalist, antiglobalization, communist, socialist, and other movements. Anarchist groups seek abolition of social, political, and economic hierarchies, including Western-style governments and large business enterprises, and frequently advocate criminal actions of varying scale and scope to accomplish their goals. Anarchist extremist groups include entities within Crimethinc, the Ruckus Society, and Recreate 68.
April 16, 2009 at 9:33 am
I also think that both the right extremist and the left extremist reports are misleading in their information and does’t cover what is really important. It is like the citizens of the US are the “terrorists”…not the real terrorists. I believe that it is clear that Janet Napitalino either does not read what she signs off on, or she agrees with both articles.
here is the link to the article I refer too. Some interesting comments..
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/15/the-vaunted-left-wing-extremism-report/
April 23, 2009 at 9:27 pm
[...] Meet Jane Q. “Right Wing Extremist” Republican « Jane Q. Republican [...]