November 11, 2009

Obama Ignores The 800 Pound Muslim Exremist Gorilla In The Room

PRESIDENT OBAMA: “Well, look, we — we have seen, in the past, rampages of this sort. And in a country of 300 million people, there are going to be acts of violence that are inexplicable. Even within the extraordinary military that we have — and I think everybody understands how outstanding the young men and women in uniform are under the most severe stress — there are going to be instances in which an individual cracks. I think the questions that we’re asking now and we don’t have yet complete answers to is, is this an individual who’s acting in this way or is it some larger set of actors? You know, what are the motivations? Those are all questions that I think we have to ask ourselves. Until we have these answers buttoned down, I’d rather not comment on it.”

Inexplicable acts of violence? This is something that we should expect to see in a nation of 300 million people? This guy cracked under stress? What are the motivations?

Yeah, right. And “Allahu Akbar” is just something stressed out people shout before the mow down 13 of their infidel colleagues in a bloody hail of bullets. What do you expect in a nation of 300 million?

Say it with me, President Obama. Muslim. Extremist. Terrorist.

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed

November 11, 2009

Wisdom From The 1940’s: A Must Watch Video

November 10, 2009

Congressman Heath Shuler: Red Tie-Republican Spotter

Some interesting new information about our Washington trip and the one of us who did get in to see Heath Shuler:

Fifteen Minutes with Heath

This past Thursday I joined 25,000 or so of my fellow liberty loving citizens in Washington DC, at a rally to urge Congress to oppose the effort by some in the US government to destroy the greatest health care system in the world. It was a whirlwind –31 hours round trip, over 900 miles and 14 hours in the car.

The trip included some scheduled time to meet with elected officials from North Carolina, and/or their representatives. The meetings were intended for the entire Asheville group, but because the schedule for the day was so fluid, none of us knew whether the meetings would actually occur as planned.

The meeting with Heath Shuler was scheduled for 1 PM, which was during the middle of the rally. I hated to leave the rally in progress. But I was carrying a letter I had written to Mr. Shuler two weeks ago, for which I had received no response. The lack of response was not unexpected, all things considered. The letter outlined why I believe he and others should vote against the current health care legislation.

At 10 minutes to one I pulled away from the rally. A police officer pointed me toward the Cannon Building, where Shuler’s office is located. I walked up the hill, went through the metal detectors, walked up to the 4th floor, found office # 422, and bam, I was in the Congressman’s office. Pretty cool I thought.

There was a lot of activity in the office. His staff was friendly and engaging. It was almost 1:15, and at first I was told Shuler was not there. I handed one of the staffers the letter. Then another staffer who appeared to have some seniority told me he was there, but had a meeting at 1:30 he could not break. Because the rest of the Asheville group was stationed almost at the very front of the stage at the rally, I doubted they would be able to get there by 1:30. She asked if I wanted to go ahead and see him by myself, and I said sure. What happened next was both bizarre, informative, and very disappointing.

Have you ever been in a conversation in which you thought you had been insulted, but you weren’t sure, because the person had no reason to insult you? Have you ever tried to have a conversation with a person who was constantly being defensive, so much so the person ends up coming across as immature? Have you ever had someone attempt to beat you with a morality stick, without a reason or the credentials to do so? Those three questions characterize my 15 minutes with Heath Shuler.

Nice tie, Congressman Shuler.

Toward the end of our time together Shuler said something, that made everything else he had done and said make sense. We were sitting around the coffee table and he leaned forward and said, “You’re a registered Republican aren’t you?” I responded, ” Yes.” ( I wish I had responded, “Does it matter?”) After my response he said, “I knew that, the red tie you are wearing gave you away.” I was honestly unaware, that apparently in Washington and some other places, a red tie is a flag for a Republican. I had worn a suit out of respect for his office, a blue one, and red seemed logical. Who knew?

I was in shock. I am a tax payer. I had driven over 400 miles to be there. My intent in being there was to express my concern over the size, scope, and direction of the federal government. And to him, a man living off the backs of tax payers, I was nothing more than a red tie. But then it all made sense. He had labeled me less than one second after seeing me. That helped explain why my first “was that an insult?” occurred within 60 seconds.

At one point during the conversation I told him he had done nothing but label me since I had gotten there. He paused, looked down, said he was sorry, and then continued!

At another point I asked him how many people in his district did he think had inadequate health care. He responded 25%. I asked “So 25% of the population is going to dictate to 75% of the population?” He responded with a smile of his face, “That’s America.” He had no response when I said, “That ain’t right.” That, by the way, is NOT America. That IS Washington. By that same math, I should have been talking to Carl Mumpower in that Congressional office, Shuler’s challenger in the last election. Again, something else I wish I had said.

I came away convinced he views the federal government as the big charity in the sky. He said many times, “we have to help those people”. I never was quite sure who “those” people are. Apparently a $1.4 trillion deficit in the most recent fiscal year is just a bother. He had no response when I asked who helped “those” people before the federal government got so big.

The meeting was bizarre in part because I was never offered the most basic of hospitalities. There was never a “welcome to Washington,” nor was there an offer of a glass of water. It was informative because I now recognize Shuler as a perfect Washington Democrat–a candidate hand picked for his celebrity rather than intellect or knowledge of government, with a basic disdain of the Constitution, with a bent to satisfy his charitable desires with someone else’s money. It was disappointing because I left the meeting with less respect for the Congressman from my district than I had when I arrived.

As a post script, I had a chance, fortuitous phone conversation on the way home, which made me feel better about about the meeting. The conversation was with a self described liberal Democrat from Asheville. I told him of my experience. He laughed and said he had had the same type experience with Shuler and his staff. I was shocked. He’s on their side, actively involved. He said because he is young and from Asheville, Shuler and his staff have labeled him as a flaming Progressive, and distance themselves from him. He too used the word label, to describe how they have interacted with him.

These are not the words or actions of a man who voted against socialized medicine on principle. By standing for nothing, Rep. Shuler has put himself in an untenable position. He cannot be counted on, his voting record is completely inconsistent, and the only interest he faithfully represents is the Congressional Democratic Caucus.

Rep. Shuler did vote “nay” on Pelosi’s Health Care Bill, but do not make the mistake of believing he represented us. If you weren’t certain, the above encounter should put to rest any doubts you have about what Rep. Shuler thinks about health care and about you.

The truth is, he might just as well have voted “yea.” At least, that would have been the honest thing to do.

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed

November 7, 2009

US House Has Passed The Pelosi Health Care Bill: UPDATED

They needed 218 votes.  They got 220.  The “yeas” were 219 Democrats and 1 Republican (Rep. Joseph Cao of Louisiana.)  

More significant: this bill passed by only 2 votes in a House with a large Democratic majority.  

Even more significant: 39 Democrat Congresspersons voted against this bill, which is the Democrat President’s signature legislation.

On to the Senate.  Down, but not out.

I don’t have the roll call yet, but who wants to put a wager on where “Blue Dog” Heath Shuler landed in this pile?  My guess is he was the first one at the ballot box so Nancy would see his smiling, dimpled face as he voted for her bill.  Man, I hope I’m wrong on this one.  We’ll find out soon.

UPDATE: I stand corrected.  Shuler voted no.  More on this in a pending post.

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed

November 7, 2009

Obama’s Epic Failure In Discernment

They say there’s a time and place for everything,  I’m not sure there really is a time and place for US Presidents to be “sending shout outs” to their colleagues.  If there is such time and place, this was certainly not it:

“As some of you might have heard…” this president is not a commander in chief.  He is a career campaigner.  Shameful.

Note too, the ease with which the master showman moves from light and chummy to somber and dignified.  Manchurian Candidate.  There’s nothing sincere in him.  

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed

November 6, 2009

Jane. Jane. Wherefore Art Thou, Jane?

Representatives of Asheville Tea Party drove a caravan of vehicles to DC for the DC “House Call” on 11.05.09. There were 17 patriots in our group. One of us actually got in to see our Congressman, Rep. Heath Shuler of NC District 11.  Unbelievable crowds.  (Report from the meeting to follow.)

The video does not include much footage of the speakers. There were too many of them. Apparently a captive audience is too much for most politicians to resist and our uprising became fodder for political posturing for what seemed the entire Republican Congressional Caucus. (Or at least all of the ones from Texas — though, sadly, no Ron Paul.)

Despite having our amazing energy level mildly dampened by the long hour of political grandstanding, we did what we came to do.

And what’s more…we will be back.

Today, I recover (sort of) from 20 hours on the road in two days.

Why would a woman with a husband and four children at home hit the road repeatedly to be present at events like this?

Why will I do it again with hundreds of thousands of others when the Senate takes up this bill?

Given what is at stake, how could I not?

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”  - Ronald Wilson Reagan

I stood next to a World War II veteran at this rally.  His son, also a veteran, wheeled him up to the front of the crowd while he smiled and greeted everyone, proudly wearing his WWII Veteran cap.  Everyone in front of him cleared a path and thanked him for his sacrifice as he passed.  I had the privilege of talking to him for a short while before the rally got loud.  He landed at Normandy on D-Day and fought for freedom from tyranny all over Europe.  In the end, he came home.  Many of his comrades did not.  So many of those who did come home are now buried in Arlington National Cemetery across the Potomac, and I felt they were standing sentry over us yesterday as we rallied in defense of our liberties that are slipping away.  He felt so too.  He is still fighting for freedom from tyranny.  And now, so am I.

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed

November 2, 2009

Goal Of “Health Care Reform”: Growth Of Government

Meet the ONE HUNDRED ELEVEN new bureaucracies in Pelosi’s Health Care bill:

1. Retiree Reserve Trust Fund (Section 111(d), p. 61)
2. Grant program for wellness programs to small employers (Section 112, p. 62)
3. Grant program for State health access programs (Section 114, p. 72)
4. Program of administrative simplification (Section 115, p. 76)
5. Health Benefits Advisory Committee (Section 223, p. 111)
6. Health Choices Administration (Section 241, p. 131)
7. Qualified Health Benefits Plan Ombudsman (Section 244, p. 138)
8. Health Insurance Exchange (Section 201, p. 155)
9. Program for technical assistance to employees of small businesses buying Exchange coverage (Section 305(h), p. 191)
10. Mechanism for insurance risk pooling to be established by Health Choices Commissioner (Section 306(b), p. 194)
11. Health Insurance Exchange Trust Fund (Section 307, p. 195)
12. State-based Health Insurance Exchanges (Section 308, p. 197)
13. Grant program for health insurance cooperatives (Section 310, p. 206)
14. “Public Health Insurance Option” (Section 321, p. 211)
15. Ombudsman for “Public Health Insurance Option” (Section 321(d), p. 213)
16. Account for receipts and disbursements for “Public Health Insurance Option” (Section 322(b), p. 215)
17. Telehealth Advisory Committee (Section 1191 (b), p. 589)
18. Demonstration program providing reimbursement for “culturally and linguistically appropriate services” (Section 1222, p. 617)
19. Demonstration program for shared decision making using patient decision aids (Section 1236, p. 648)
20. Accountable Care Organization pilot program under Medicare (Section 1301, p. 653)
21. Independent patient-centered medical home pilot program under Medicare (Section 1302, p. 672)
22. Community-based medical home pilot program under Medicare (Section 1302(d), p. 681)
23. Independence at home demonstration program (Section 1312, p. 718)
24. Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research (Section 1401(a), p. 734)
25. Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission (Section 1401(a), p. 738)
26. Patient ombudsman for comparative effectiveness research (Section 1401(a), p. 753)
27. Quality assurance and performance improvement program for skilled nursing facilities (Section 1412(b)(1), p. 784)
28. Quality assurance and performance improvement program for nursing facilities (Section 1412 (b)(2), p. 786)
29. Special focus facility program for skilled nursing facilities (Section 1413(a)(3), p. 796)
30. Special focus facility program for nursing facilities (Section 1413(b)(3), p. 804)
31. National independent monitor pilot program for skilled nursing facilities and nursing facilities (Section 1422, p. 859)
32. Demonstration program for approved teaching health centers with respect to Medicare GME (Section 1502(d), p. 933)
33. Pilot program to develop anti-fraud compliance systems for Medicare providers (Section 1635, p. 978)
34. Special Inspector General for the Health Insurance Exchange (Section 1647, p. 1000)
35. Medical home pilot program under Medicaid (Section 1722, p. 1058)
36. Accountable Care Organization pilot program under Medicaid (Section 1730A, p. 1073)
37. Nursing facility supplemental payment program (Section 1745, p. 1106)
38. Demonstration program for Medicaid coverage to stabilize emergency medical conditions in institutions for mental diseases (Section 1787, p. 1149)
39. Comparative Effectiveness Research Trust Fund (Section 1802, p. 1162)
40. “Identifiable office or program” within CMS to “provide for improved coordination between Medicare and Medicaid in the case of dual eligibles” (Section 1905, p. 1191)
Keep reading →

November 2, 2009

Health Care Reform Video Finalist

Direct from President Obama’s own website, here is one of the top twenty Health Care Reform videos:

Hat tip: NC Freedom

I gather the folks at mybarackobama.com have never heard of the United States Code Title 4 Chapter 1 Section 3:

Any person who, within the District of Columbia, in any manner, for exhibition or display, shall place or cause to be placed any word, figure, mark, picture, design, drawing, or any advertisement of any nature upon any flag, standard, colors, or ensign of the United States of America; or shall expose or cause to be exposed to public view any such flag, standard, colors, or ensign upon which shall have been printed, painted, or otherwise placed, or to which shall be attached, appended, affixed, or annexed any word, figure, mark, picture, design, or drawing, or any advertisement of any nature … shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $100 or by imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or both, in the discretion of the court. The words “flag, standard, colors, or ensign”, as used herein, shall include any flag, standard, colors, ensign, or any picture or representation of either, or of any part or parts of either, made of any substance or represented on any substance, of any size evidently purporting to be either of said flag, standard, colors, or ensign of the United States of America or a picture or a representation of either, upon which shall be shown the colors, the stars and the stripes, in any number of either thereof, or of any part or parts of either, by which the average person seeing the same without deliberation may believe the same to represent the flag, colors, standard, or ensign of the United States of America.

Probably too busy reading Mao.

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed

November 1, 2009

Obama: “Under My Plan” Is A License To Lie

The President and his supporters want us to believe that their proposed health care legislation won’t cover abortions with federal funds.  The President famously made this claim in his address of the Joint Session of Congress, framing it as a repudiation of people who are trying to “misinform” the citizenry.

Interestingly, at the time President Obama made his speech, the Energy and Commerce Committee had approved an amendment to the House bill (HR 3200) by Democratic Rep. Lois Capps which actually mandates that at least one insurance plan in each state-based “exchange”—the only place people receiving federal health-insurance subsidies will be allowed to buy health insurance—must cover abortions.

Enter Bart Stupak, one brave Democrat.  I don’t know anything about this man outside of the following, but I admire his position on Presidential fabrications:

On Aug. 21, after Obama gave a radio talk insisting it was “not true” the health care plan would allow federal funding of abortion, FactCheck.org concluded, “Despite what Obama said, the House bill would allow abortions to be covered by a federal plan and by federally subsidized private plans.”

Nothing had changed by Sept. 9, when Obama reiterated his claim to the joint session of Congress.

In an interview last week, I read to Stupak the exact words Obama said that night about abortion funding. Stupak told me that when he got Obama on the phone, he had read those very words to Obama himself.

Obama responded to Stupak—a former police officer—that when he said these words he was not talking about the actual health care plan developed by the House, he was talking about his own plan—a plan that has never been written.

“I called him,” Stupak told me. “I called the president—had a discussion with the president. And I read exactly what you just said. And he said: What it says is ‘under my plan’—meaning the president’s plan. And I said: With all due respect, sir, you do not have a plan. The only plan we have out is the House plan. So, I don’t know if it is a game of semantics or what.”

Stupak said Obama did not try to tell him the House bill does not fund abortion.

I asked Stupak if, when Obama claimed “our plan” does not fund abortions, the president meant some plan that existed only “theoretically.”

“Correct,” said Stupak. “And when I pointed this out, he said: Go back and work with the people on your committee and get this matter worked out. Work with the speaker. Work with us, would you? And I said: Yes, I would. And we have tried.”

Our President is a manipulative, calculating wordsmith who has no allegiance to Truth.

Bart Stupak appears to be the remedy to such cunning.

Stupak, meanwhile, is standing by his vow to try to kill the health care bill entirely if House Speaker Nancy Pelosi does not allow a direct up or down vote on his amendment on the House floor.

Stupak told CNSNews.com last week that he has organized a group of “about 40 likeminded Democrats” who are supporting him in this effort.

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed

November 1, 2009

Yes, Nancy, We’re Serious

Asked by CNSNews.com last week where specifically the Constitution authorizes Congress to mandate that individuals buy health insurance, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said, “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

Is that your final answer?

A Congressional Research Service report concluded that requiring individuals to purchase or have health insurance could be challenged.

“Whether such a requirement would be constitutional under the Commerce Clause is perhaps the most challenging question posed by such a proposal, as it is a novel issue whether Congress may use this clause to require an individual to purchase a good or service,” the CRS reportedly says.

In 1994, when the Clinton administration attempted to push a health care reform plan through a Democratic Congress that also mandated every American buy health insurance, the Congressional Budget Office determined that the government had never ordered Americans to buy anything.

“The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States,” the CBO analysis said. “An individual mandate would have two features that, in combination, would make it unique. First, it would impose a duty on individuals as members of society. Second, it would require people to purchase a specific service that would be heavily regulated by the federal government.”

No, he certainly won’t be confused with a Constitutional scholar, will he?

Subscribe to Jane’s daily email.
Subscribe to Jane Q. by RSS Feed